Volume 3, Issue 6, December 2015, Page: 126-130
A Review of High School Physics Education in the United States of America
Serif Uran, Department of Physics, Pittsburg State University, Pittsburg, KS
Received: Sep. 10, 2015;       Accepted: Nov. 4, 2015;       Published: Nov. 24, 2015
DOI: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20150306.12      View  3377      Downloads  68
Physics is often considered to be one of the most difficult subjects to study. Thus, it is particularly important to have good physics teachers to teach the subject. However, a close look at the statistical data indicates that about 67% of high school physics teachers did not major in physics. Physics is being taught by teachers that are in variety of subjects, mostly another science and math. In addition, two-third of the 27,000 physics teachers teach other subjects than physics. Quantitative/Qualitative assessments and reasoning are made about the statistical data. Potential reasons for the current statistics and consequences are discussed. In addition, lack of mathematics background in the freshman and sophomore years of high school appears to push the physics classes towards junior and senior years, taken as an elective, or not taken at all. High school curriculum, teacher training and salary issues are also discussed.
Physics Education, High School Physics Education, Science Education, Physics Teachers
To cite this article
Serif Uran, A Review of High School Physics Education in the United States of America, Science Journal of Education. Vol. 3, No. 6, 2015, pp. 126-130. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20150306.12
Paula Heron and David Meltzer, “The Future of Physics Education Research: Intellectual Challenges and Practical Concerns,” Am. J. Phys. 73 (5), 390-394 (2005)
David Hammer, “Student Resources for Learning Introductory Physics,” Am. J. Phys. 68 (S1), S52-S59 (2000)
Jonathan Tuminaro and Edward F. Redish, “Elements of a Cognitive Model of Physics Problem Solving: Epistemic Games,” Phys. Rev. ST PER 3 (2007)
Young-Jin Lee, David J. Palazzo, Rasil Warnakulasooriya, and David E. Pritchard, “Measuring Student Learning with Item Response Theory,” Phys. Rev. ST PER4 (1), 010102 (2008); Lei Bao and Edward F. Redish, “Model Analysis: Representing and Assessing the Dynamics of Student Learning,” Phys. Rev. ST PER 2 (010103), 16 (2006)
Rosemary Russ, Rachel Scherr, David Hammer, and Jamie Mikeska, “Recognizing Mechanistic Reasoning in Student Scientific Inquiry: A Framework for Discourse Analysis Developed from Philosophy of Science,” Sci. Ed. 92, 499-525 (2008)
Chandralekha Singh, “Assessing Student Expertise in Introductory Physics with Isomorphic Problems. I. Performance on Nonintuitive Problem Pair from Introductory Physics,” Phys. Rev. ST PER 4 (1), 010104 (2008)
American Institute of Physics, focus on, December 2014 issue, https://www.aip.org/sites/default/files/statistics/highschool/hs-whoteaches-13.pdf
Jason G. Hill and Kerry J. Gruber, Education and Certification Qualifications of Departmentalized Public High School-Level Teachers of Core Subjects: Evidence from the 2007-08 Schools and Staffing Survey, Statistical Analysis Report [NCES 2011-317] (National Center For Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C., 2011). Available at: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2011/2011317.pdf
National Center for Education Statistics, http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=97
Private communications with high school teachers and administrators
The New York Times, “When Science Suddenly Mattered, in Space and in Class”, Cornelia Dean, 2007, http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/25/science/space/25educ.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Nova, “Sputnik’s Impact on America”, Paul Dickson, 2007 http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/space/sputnik-impact-on-america.html
National Public Radio (NPR), “U.S. Students Slide In Global Ranking On Math, Reading, Science”, Bill Chappell, 2013, http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2013/12/03/248329823/u-s-high-school-students-slide-in-math-reading-science
Browse journals by subject