Volume 4, Issue 4, August 2016, Page: 123-128
Enhanced Performance in High School Electricity Practical: The Micro Electricity Kit Use Versus Conventional Apparatus
Monica Khasandi Mulongo, Department of Science Education, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kakamega, Kenya
Amadalo Maurice Musasia, Department of Science Education, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kakamega, Kenya
Michieka Ronald Mong’are, Department of Science Education, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kakamega, Kenya
Received: Jul. 6, 2016;       Accepted: Jul. 13, 2016;       Published: Jul. 28, 2016
DOI: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20160404.11      View  3627      Downloads  105
This study investigated students’ performance in electricity practical through the usage of micro electricity kits and conventional laboratory apparatus in Kakamega North sub-county as an intervention mechanism. Specifically the study compared the learners’ performance in an electricity practical test by students who used the micro electricity kit and those taught using conventional experimental apparatus. The research design adopted for the study was a two group quasi-experimental randomized pretest-posttest experimental design. A sample size of 537 form two students from fourteen schools were selected by stratified random sampling technique. The experimental group was exposed to the use of micro electricity kits while the control group was conventionally subjected to the same instructional technique. Two performance tests (EPT1 and EPT2) which acted as pre-test (bulbs in series and parallel) and post-test (ohms law) respectively of reliability index 0.74 and 0.87 were administered to both groups at an interval of one month between them. Validity of the instruments was determined with the help of three experienced secondary school teachers at values between 6 and 9 out of 10 for each of them. The obtained data were analyzed according to the hypothesis using both descriptive (means, percentages frequencies tables) and inferential (t-test chi square and anova) statistics. The findings indicated that students who used micro kits performed better than those who used conventional apparatus in electricity practical. Students from county schools performed better than those from sub-county schools. Male students who used the kits performed better than female students. Therefore the kits should be incorporated in the Kenyan school curriculum. These kits can be mainstreamed in physics practical work so as to provide practical experience and conceptual understanding of physics concepts. The government should provide adequate finances, laboratories, apparatus and teachers to sub-county schools so as to compete with the county schools. Physics teachers should also give attention and encourage female physics students during practical sessions such that both male and female students can perform better in the study of physics.
High School, Electricity, Practical, Micro Electricity Kits, Performance in Electricity Practical
To cite this article
Monica Khasandi Mulongo, Amadalo Maurice Musasia, Michieka Ronald Mong’are, Enhanced Performance in High School Electricity Practical: The Micro Electricity Kit Use Versus Conventional Apparatus, Science Journal of Education. Vol. 4, No. 4, 2016, pp. 123-128. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20160404.11
Copyright © 2016 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Phatak, O. (2013). Discoveries that gave physics its theoretical foundation. Education journal, 8 (1), 11-19.
Murenzi, M. R. (2006). Physics has a key role in development. Retrieved on 3rd May 2013 from http://www.scidev.net/en/opinions/physics-has-a-key-role-in-development.html
Sadler, P. M., & Tai, R. H. (1997). The role of high school physics in preparing students for college physics. The Physics Teacher, 35, 282–285.
Harry T. (2011). Why college bound students should take physics at high school. Retrieved 7th July 2015 from zttp://faculty.ucr.edu/~leonid/2012_files /Tom_Jobs_2012.pdf
Deloitte report, (2012). A report prepared for the Institute Physics by Deloitte: The importance of physics to the UK economy. IOP Institute of Physics, London.
Ogunniyi, M. B. (1986). Two decades of science education in Africa. Science Education, 70 (2), 111-122.
Area Chair’s handbook (2013). Strengthening physics education supporting physics educators. Maryland 20740, American Association of Physics Teachers, One Physics Ellipse College Park. pg 17.
Manzini, S. (2000). Learners’ Attitudes towards the Teaching of Indigenous African Science as part of the School Science Curriculum. Journal of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Technology and Science Education. 4 (1), pg 19-32.
White, R. T. (1996). The link between the laboratory and learning. International Journal of science Education, 15 (5), 591-605.
Muwanga-Zake, J. W. F. (1998). Is science education in crisis? Some of the problems in South Africa. Science Education. Online at http://www.scienceinafrica.co.za/scicrisis.htm
Duit, R. (1991). Students’ conceptual frameworks: Consequences for leaning science. In S. M. Glyn, R. H. Yeany, B. K. Britton (Eds.). The psychology of learning science, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers. PP. 65-85.
Bradley, J. D & Vermaak, I (1996). Microscale chemistry from an African perspective. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Chemical Education. 100-107, Brisbane, Australia. Royal Australian Chemical Institute.
Wasanga P. M., (2009). The role of examination results as a feedback tool: The Kenyan Experience, First READ Global Conference: Developing a Vision for Assessment Systems, September, 30 –October 2, pp 13-15.
Daramola S. O., (1987). Restructuring Science Education Programmes in Nigerian Higher Institutions, Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 2 (1 & 2), 235-240.
Hofstein, A. & Lunetta, V. N. (2003). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century, Review of Educational Research, 52 (2), 201-217.
Orukotan, A. F & Balogun, E. M (2001). Providing an effective participation of women in science mathematics and technology in Nigeria through gender responsive education. 42nd Annual conference proceedings of Science Teachers Association of Nigeria. Pg 218-221.
Fatoba J. O & Aladejana A. L., (2014). Effects of gender on students’ attitude to physics in secondary schools in Oyo state, Nigeria, European Scientific Journal, 10 (7), 399-404.
Raimi S. M & Adeoye F. A. (2006). Gender differences among college students’ as determinants of performance in Integrated Science. African Journal of Educational Research, 8 (1&2), 41-49.
Croxford, L (2002). Gender and national curricular: Shifting Agendas in the UK and Europe. London: Routledge.
McGuire, P, Ealy, J. & Pickering, M. (1991). Microscale laboratory at the high school level: time efficiency and student response. Journal of Chemical Education, 68 (10), 869-871.
Macmillan, M. J (2013). Effects of practical physics knowledge on students’ academic achievement: A Study of Pankshin Local Government Area Plateau State, Nigeria. World Educators Forum. Pg 1-9
Aina, J. K & Akintunde, Z. T (2013)|. Analysis of Gender Performance in Physics in Colleges of Education, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice. 4 (6).
Browse journals by subject